| Holier-than-thou sorts |
LA Times Daily |
29 Aug 2025 |
| Hung out with unsightliest awful snobs |
|
|
| Select group members |
|
|
| Snobby sorts |
Newsday |
15 Nov 2024 |
| First of eleven records describing sex to snobs (8) |
|
|
| Snobs |
Commuter |
11 Jul 2024 |
| List site incorrectly for highly selective types (8) |
|
|
| Snobs |
Commuter |
26 Apr 2024 |
| People who favour government by the few (8) |
|
|
| Snobs |
Commuter |
12 Jan 2024 |
| Special people ordered titles about island (8) |
|
|
| Snobs |
The Times Concise |
16 Apr 2022 |
| Quarter settled first on scones, not wafers (they want the cream on top) |
|
|
| Snobs |
Universal |
14 May 2021 |
| Snobs |
LA Times Daily |
10 Jul 2020 |
| Snobs |
The Washington Post |
10 Jul 2020 |
| Snobbish types |
Eugene Sheffer |
13 Aug 2019 |
| They don't identify with the working class |
The Washington Post Sunday |
23 Jun 2019 |
| Snobs |
The Sun Two Speed |
10 Jun 2019 |
| One in set list changed for snooty people |
The Sun Two Speed |
10 Jun 2019 |
| Select group in English Literature is embracing someone really good |
The Telegraph Toughie |
22 May 2019 |
| Plutocracy supporters |
The Washington Post Sunday |
24 Feb 2019 |
| Snobbish sorts |
USA Today |
23 Dec 2018 |
| Supercilious sorts |
Wall Street Journal |
15 Feb 2018 |
| Snobbish sorts |
|
|
| Snobby types |
Universal |
13 Dec 2017 |
| Snobby types |
|
|
| High-hatters |
Universal |
31 Mar 2015 |
| Snobs |
Thomas Joseph |
16 Feb 2015 |
| High-hatters |
|
|
| They think they're special |
|
|
| Some hipsters |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| They don't associate with the hoi polloi |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| Pretentious people |
|
|
| Above-the-rest people |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| They believe in ruling classes |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| High-hatters |
|
|
| Hoi polloi scorners |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| Contemptuous crowd |
|
|
| Guillotine candidates, once |
|
|
| Stuck-up folks |
|
|
| Snobs |
|
|
| Those of select groups |
|
|
| Believers in rule by superior people |
|
|
| Group whose opinions are so much better than yours, obviously |
|
|