Unfashionable origin of itself, for one? (6,4) |
|
|
Old-fashioned cricketer's 2 for 4? |
The Times Cryptic |
20 Jun 2025 |
Perhaps two to four old-fashioned causes finally ditched |
The Telegraph Toughie |
11 Feb 2025 |
Old-fashioned origin of a mathematical function |
|
|
1 for 1 or 3 for 9, say |
|
|
*Two, to four, e.g |
LA Times Daily |
26 Jun 2023 |
Second power’s counterpart |
Wall Street Journal |
05 Aug 2022 |
Part of the quadratic formula |
USA Today |
13 May 2021 |
One of two for a positive number |
The Washington Post |
06 Sep 2020 |
One of two for a positive number |
LA Times Daily |
06 Sep 2020 |
Even score with England captain: one for one? |
The Telegraph Toughie |
08 Sep 2017 |
Mathematical term |
The Telegraph Quick |
24 Jul 2017 |
Three, to nine |
The Washington Post |
17 May 2017 |
Three, to nine |
LA Times Daily |
17 May 2017 |
Two, to four |
USA Today |
10 Apr 2017 |
Two, to four |
|
|
Three, to nine |
|
|
10, to 100 |
|
|
One, to one, e.g. |
|
|
What cuts power in half? |
|
|
Three, to nine |
|
|
Four, to 16 |
|
|
4, to 16, e.g. |
|
|
Calculator button |
|
|
Radical solution? |
|
|
3, to 9 |
|
|
Math term |
|
|
Two, to four |
|
|
8, for 64 |
|
|
4, to 16, e.g. |
|
|
Gardening nerd? |
|
|
Two, to four, e.g. |
|
|
It may be extracted |
|
|
Radical |
|
|
What 3 is to 9 |
|
|
Underground rarity? |
|
|
Math term. |
|
|
Mathematical term. |
|
|
2 for 4? |
|
|