| Smaller part of wedding cake, popular for eating (6) |
|
|
| More microscopic |
USA Today |
02 Feb 2024 |
| More microscopic |
Newsday |
22 Jan 2023 |
| More minuscule |
Eugene Sheffer |
27 Aug 2022 |
| More itsy-bitsy |
USA Today |
26 Mar 2022 |
| More minuscule |
Thomas Joseph |
01 Mar 2022 |
| Much smaller |
Newsday |
28 Apr 2021 |
| Like atoms vis-à-vis molecules |
New York Times |
27 Apr 2021 |
| More minute |
LA Times Daily |
10 Mar 2021 |
| More minute |
The Washington Post |
10 Mar 2021 |
| Like each succeeding eye chart line |
The Washington Post |
15 Mar 2020 |
| Like each succeeding eye chart line |
LA Times Daily |
15 Mar 2020 |
| Like the inner matryoshka doll, compared to the outer |
The New Yorker |
03 Feb 2020 |
| Even smaller than Tim? |
|
|
| More minuscule |
Eugene Sheffer |
09 Oct 2019 |
| More minuscule |
Thomas Joseph |
21 Jan 2019 |
| Harder to read, perhaps |
Wall Street Journal |
25 Oct 2018 |
| Less significant |
The Washington Post Sunday |
30 Sep 2018 |
| Less significant |
Newsday |
25 Feb 2018 |
| More wee |
Universal |
07 Feb 2018 |
| Harder to read, perhaps |
|
|
| More wee |
|
|
| Much smaller |
The Times Concise |
22 Mar 2017 |
| Hold it up – it's not so big |
|
|
| Even smaller |
LA Times Daily |
29 Jan 2017 |
| More eensy |
Premier Sunday |
19 Jun 2016 |
| More itty-bitty |
Premier Sunday |
17 Apr 2016 |
| Like each line of an eye chart vis-à-vis the one above |
New York Times |
14 Feb 2016 |
| Like each line of an eye chart vis-à-vis the one above |
|
|
| Part of wedding cake popular to eat, though smaller |
The Sun Two Speed |
24 Nov 2015 |
| Even smaller |
The Sun Two Speed |
24 Nov 2015 |
| More petite |
USA Today |
25 Oct 2015 |
| Row about batting less |
|
|
| Can I run after, ultimately, one more minute? |
The Telegraph Toughie |
22 Jan 2015 |
| More petite |
|
|
| More miniature |
|
|
| Requiring greater magnification |
|
|
| Much smaller |
|
|
| Not as big |
|
|
| More petite |
|
|
| More diminutive |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| Harder to make out |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| Harder to see |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| More petite |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| More minute |
|
|
| More petite |
|
|
| More 26-Across |
|
|
| More minute |
|
|
| More minute |
|
|
| More microscopic |
|
|
| Not as big |
|
|
| Harder to make out |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| More diminutive |
|
|
| Extremely small |
|
|
| More minute |
|
|
| More microscopic |
|
|
| More downsized |
|
|
| Not nearly as big |
|
|
| More minute |
|
|
| More diminutive |
|
|
| Less, in a way |
|
|
| More diminutive |
|
|
| Harder to make out, maybe |
|
|
| Smaller |
|
|
| More compact |
|
|
| More miniscule |
|
|
| Like the bottom of an eye chart, comparatively speaking |
|
|
| Harder to see |
|
|
| More minuscule |
|
|
| Smaller. |
|
|
| Littler. |
|
|
| More minute. |
|
|
| More dwarfish. |
|
|
| Comparatively small. |
|
|