Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
"___ would have thought?" Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue "___ would have thought?" . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 3 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is WHO.
Love the NYT Mini? Try our Mini. You'll like our free daily Mini Crossword.
Fresh puzzles every day, no paywall.
Crossword Answer For "___ would have thought?":
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | WHO "___ would have thought?" | (3) | ||
| 81% | GOFIGURE "Who would have thought?" | (8) | Universal | May 5, 2025 |
| 81% | THATSO "Never would have thought" | (6) | LA Times Daily | Feb 14, 2024 |
| 72% | DUH "I would have thought it was obvious" | (3) | ||
| 60% | UNDREAMEDOF Formed a dune? Who would have thought? (9,2) | (11) | ||
| 48% | WELL I NEVER DID Good grades Paul was always unable to attain — who would have thought it! | (16) | ||
| 9% | WANTS Would like to have | (5) | Newsday | Nov 19, 2025 |
| 8% | ANY "___ thoughts?" | (3) | New York Times Mini | Nov 23, 2025 |
| 8% | IDEA Thought | (4) | The Atlantic | Nov 23, 2025 |
| 8% | UPON "___ further reflection ..." ("Having thought about it ...") | (4) |
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for "___ would have thought?". The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is WHO.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for "___ would have thought?".