Adam's lack, theoretically Crossword Clue

Here is the answer for the crossword clue Adam's lack, theoretically . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 5 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is NAVEL.

Today's Mini Crossword

Like NYT Mini, but free. Forever. No playwall.

See results below advertisement

Crossword Answer For Adam's lack, theoretically:

You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.

advertisement

40 Potential Answers:

RankAnswerLengthSourceDate
98% NAVEL Adam's lack, theoretically (5)
77% VEEP John Adams was the U.S.'s first (4) Universal Jul 6, 2026
70% ERWIN Theoretical physicist Schrödinger (5) Wall Street Journal Jun 29, 2026
70% EVE Adam and __ (3) Commuter Jun 1, 2026
66% ENOS Adam's grandson (4) Eugene Sheffer Jul 15, 2026
66% END The Big Crunch, theoretically, for our universe (3) New York Times Jul 12, 2026
66% DEVOID Lacking (6) Eugene Sheffer Jul 11, 2026
66% AMY Adams of "Arrival" (3) Wall Street Journal Jul 7, 2026
66% ANSEL Photographer Adams (5) Wall Street Journal Jul 6, 2026
66% JOHN Hancock or Adams (4) Newsday Jul 1, 2026
Adam's lack, theoretically Crossword Clue
Stay up-to-date with our updates!
Explore your favorite daily puzzles and get quick tips, find missing answers to complete your crossword.
CW alt logo

Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles

Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide

We found 40 solutions for Adam's lack, theoretically. The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is NAVEL.

With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.

With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Adam's lack, theoretically.