Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 5 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is SHREW.
Love the NYT Mini? Try our Mini. You'll like our free daily Mini Crossword.
Fresh puzzles every day, no paywall.
Crossword Answer For Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5):
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | SHREW Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) | (5) | ||
| 7% | BIT Kate Hudson's "A Little ___ of Heaven" | (3) | ||
| 7% | VOLE Mouselike rodent | (4) | The Telegraph Cross Atlantic | Sep 6, 2025 |
| 5% | TOO As well | (3) | Eugene Sheffer | Nov 10, 2025 |
| 5% | ELENI Kate Nelligan title role | (5) | Premier Sunday | Nov 9, 2025 |
| 5% | DUH "Well, obviously!" | (3) | ||
| 5% | SPA Wellness centre | (3) | The Telegraph Cross Atlantic | Nov 4, 2025 |
| 5% | HMO Wellness grp. | (3) | Wall Street Journal | Nov 1, 2025 |
| 5% | SONOFA "That little-" | (6) | TV | Oct 26, 2025 |
| 5% | ACED Served well | (4) | Thomas Joseph | Oct 25, 2025 |
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5). The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is SHREW.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5).