Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 5 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is SHREW.
Love the NYT Mini? Try our Mini. You'll like our free daily Mini Crossword.
Fresh puzzles every day, no paywall.
Crossword Answer For Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5):
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | SHREW Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5) | (5) | ||
| 6% | VOLE Small, mouselike rodent | (4) | New York Times Mini | Nov 28, 2025 |
| 6% | OLSEN Mary-Kate or Ashley | (5) | Universal | Nov 19, 2025 |
| 6% | ALSO As well | (4) | Commuter | Nov 18, 2025 |
| 6% | TOO As well | (3) | Eugene Sheffer | Nov 10, 2025 |
| 6% | BIT Kate Hudson's "A Little ___ of Heaven" | (3) | ||
| 5% | GEE "Well, gosh!" | (3) | LA Times Daily | Dec 1, 2025 |
| 5% | POPULAR Well-liked | (7) | Commuter | Nov 28, 2025 |
| 5% | LATER In a little while | (5) | Newsday | Nov 24, 2025 |
| 5% | TITS Little birds | (4) | The Telegraph Cross Atlantic | Nov 24, 2025 |
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5). The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is SHREW.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Kate was a little mouselike? Well, no (5).