Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
Roe v. Wade et al. Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue Roe v. Wade et al. . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 9 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is TESTCASES.
Today's Mini Crossword
Like NYT Mini, but free. Forever. No playwall. Love the NYT Mini? You'll like our free daily Mini Crossword. Fresh puzzles every day, no paywall.
Crossword Answer For Roe v. Wade et al.:
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | TESTCASES Roe v. Wade et al. | (9) | ||
| 7% | ROE ___ v. Wade | (3) | USA Today | Jun 12, 2026 |
| 6% | LINDACOFFEE Lawyer who co-argued in favor of Roe v. Wade | (11) | USA Today | Jun 15, 2026 |
| 6% | NORMA ___ McCorvey ("Jane Roe" in Roe v. Wade) | (5) | ||
| 5% | CARBS Rice, bread, et al. | (5) | The Atlantic | Jul 12, 2026 |
| 5% | IBIS Wading bird | (4) | The Telegraph Cross Atlantic | Jul 8, 2026 |
| 5% | MILT Female : roe :: male : ____ | (4) | The Atlantic | Jul 5, 2026 |
| 5% | PPE 3M helmets et al. | (3) | Newsday | Jul 4, 2026 |
| 5% | EGRET Wading bird | (5) | New York Times | Jun 29, 2026 |
| 5% | PREFECTS Head girl et al | (8) | The Telegraph Cross Atlantic | Jun 28, 2026 |
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for Roe v. Wade et al.. The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is TESTCASES.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Roe v. Wade et al..