Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently? Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently? last seen in Telegraph Cryptic puzzle. We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 8 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is PHASEOUT.
Crossword Answer For Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently?:
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | PHASEOUT Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently? | (8) | The Telegraph Cryptic | Nov 17, 2021 |
| 5% | SEEP Leak slowly | (4) | Newsday | Sep 29, 2025 |
| 5% | SEEPS Runs slowly | (5) | New York Times | Sep 27, 2025 |
| 5% | FADES Slowly disappears | (5) | LA Times Daily | Sep 26, 2025 |
| 5% | OOZE Leak slowly | (4) | Eugene Sheffer | Sep 23, 2025 |
| 5% | PILE Heap | (4) | USA Today | Sep 22, 2025 |
| 5% | RUCK Fight; heap | (4) | The Telegraph Quick | Sep 18, 2025 |
| 5% | ALOT Heaps | (4) | Thomas Joseph | Sep 15, 2025 |
| 5% | CLOSED Shut (6) | (6) | The Guardian Quick | Sep 15, 2025 |
| 5% | TROTTED Ran slowly | (7) | Commuter | Sep 12, 2025 |
Last appeared together with the following clues in Telegraph Cryptic puzzle
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently?. The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is PHASEOUT.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Slowly get shut of heaps, apparently?.