Search Answers
Search Crossword Answers
Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2) Crossword Clue
Here is the answer for the crossword clue Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2) . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 5 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is NEWTO.
Crossword Answer For Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2):
You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.
40 Potential Answers:
| Rank | Answer | Length | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98% | NEWTO Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2) | (5) | ||
| 8% | USEDTO Familiar with | (6) | Universal | Aug 29, 2025 |
| 7% | OUR Couple's pronoun | (3) | Eugene Sheffer | Sep 6, 2025 |
| 7% | TWO A couple | (3) | Commuter | Aug 27, 2025 |
| 7% | ODD "The ___ Couple" | (3) | TV | Aug 24, 2025 |
| 7% | COUNTERFEITER One furnishing shop reportedly is fraudulent type | (13) | The Times Cryptic | Aug 22, 2025 |
| 7% | OLDSAW Familiar saying | (6) | Universal | Aug 18, 2025 |
| 7% | HART Centre reportedly does attract one (4) | (4) | The Sun Two Speed | Aug 18, 2025 |
| 7% | DUO Couple | (3) | Premier Sunday | Aug 3, 2025 |
| 7% | PAIR Couple | (4) | The Telegraph Quick | Jul 29, 2025 |
Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles
Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide
We found 40 solutions for Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2). The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is NEWTO.
With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.
With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Was familiar with a couple reportedly but not this one (3,2).