Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4) Crossword Clue

Here is the answer for the crossword clue Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4) . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 4 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is VAMP.

See results below advertisement

Crossword Answer For Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4):

You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.

advertisement

40 Potential Answers:

RankAnswerLengthSourceDate
98% VAMP Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4) (4)
6% EROTIC Amorous (6) (6) Puzzler Sep 11, 2025
6% OVID "Amores" poet (4) Eugene Sheffer Aug 28, 2025
6% KOALA Eucalyptus eater (5)
5% SOURCE Origin (6) Thomas Joseph Sep 13, 2025
5% OHSO Very, very (4) The Washington Post Mini Sep 12, 2025
5% TAT Rubbish, this and that originally (3) The Times Quick Cryptic Sep 11, 2025
5% DRIP Stalactite origin (4) LA Times Daily Sep 6, 2025
5% MIDAS The original Goldfinger? (5) Universal Sep 4, 2025
5% ALIEN Little green man, perhaps (5) (5) Puzzler Sep 3, 2025
Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4) Crossword Clue
Stay up-to-date with our updates!
Explore your favorite daily puzzles and get quick tips, find missing answers to complete your crossword.
CW alt logo

Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles

Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide

We found 40 solutions for Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4). The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is VAMP.

With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.

With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Originally very amorous man-eater perhaps? (4).