Wrong description of second-in-command? Crossword Clue

Here is the answer for the crossword clue Wrong description of second-in-command? . We have found 40 possible answers for this clue in our database. Among them, one solution stands out with a 98% match which has a length of 4 letters. We think the likely answer to this clue is VICE.

Today's Mini Crossword

Like NYT Mini, but free. Forever. No playwall.

See results below advertisement

Crossword Answer For Wrong description of second-in-command? :

You can click on thetiles to reveal letter by letter before uncovering the full solution.

advertisement

40 Potential Answers:

RankAnswerLengthSourceDate
98% VICE Wrong description of second-in-command? (4)
7% ASST Second-in-command, briefly (4) Universal Oct 16, 2025
6% AWRY Wrong (4) Wall Street Journal Nov 10, 2025
6% ORDER Command (5) The Telegraph Mini Nov 8, 2025
6% AMISS Wrong (5) The Telegraph Quick Nov 6, 2025
5% ERROR Wrong move (5) Newsday Dec 7, 2025
5% TORT Civil wrong (4) USA Today Dec 2, 2025
5% ENVY Subject of the Tenth Commandment (4) New York Times Dec 2, 2025
5% PRINT Word processor command (5) Thomas Joseph Dec 2, 2025
5% TORTS Civil wrongs (5) Eugene Sheffer Dec 1, 2025
Wrong description of second-in-command?  Crossword Clue
Stay up-to-date with our updates!
Explore your favorite daily puzzles and get quick tips, find missing answers to complete your crossword.
CW alt logo

Fresh Clues From Recent Puzzles

Your Crossword Clues FAQ Guide

We found 40 solutions for Wrong description of second-in-command? . The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is VICE.

With crossword-solver.io you will find 40 solutions. We use historic puzzles to find the best matches for your question. We add many new clues on a daily basis.

With our crossword solver search engine you have access to over 7 million clues. You can narrow down the possible answers by specifying the number of letters it contains. We found more than 40 answers for Wrong description of second-in-command? .